The mantra of the sex education crowd for years has been that if we only taught these sweet little cherubs the intricate details of sex and the downside of teenage pregnancy that they would catch the vision of proper precautions and the teen pregnancy rate would decrease. Well, the enlightened ones got some sort of come-uppance the other day. It seems that the New York City school system has been handing out “Plan B” emergency contraception for the past year, in an attempt to decrease the teen pregnancy numbers afflicting the system. Plan B is a “backup” plan that consists of one tablet of levonorgestrel that helps prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex or birth control failure. It seems that over 7,000 teenage girls became pregnant last year in New York alone, with the majority dropping out of school. Sixty four percent of these pregnancies ended in abortion.
The New York City school system had to do something. What they did seems to me to be a tacit admission that sex education programs don’t or can’t deliver on their promises. If they did, then there wouldn’t be a need for this Plan B.
What’s next, RU-486 (the abortion pill) prior to gym? Or a walk-in abortion clinic after chemistry class? And why even have sex education at all, if this is where it is going to lead?
Dr. K
"There is no such thing as safe sex. Never was. Never will be."
Norman Mailer
Posted by: Tony Francis | 09/25/2012 at 10:58 AM
It's just irresponsible for you to make a causal link between sex education in general and this specific case in particular. Teaching sex education to young people leads to a variety of outcomes, some you might agree with and others not. To suggest that this is a reason to not have sex education in public schools at all is really an overreaction, a moralistic exasperation, that I hope you Americans can really begin to eliminate from your public discourse.
Posted by: A Canadian observer | 09/26/2012 at 12:18 PM
Perhaps I have been less than artful in my explanation of this issue. Public health is at its core a preventative specialty. As many know, prevention can be of a primary, secondary, or tertiary nature. In most areas of medicine, primary measures of prevention are lauded as the most beneficial, and tertiary measures are considered a failure in a population context. As a simple example, hypertension and its complications can prevented in a primary fashion by proper diet and exercise, in a secondary way through medications, and finally, the complications of hypertension, such as heart disease, can be treated in a tertiary manner through more invasive means such as surgery. Traumatic brain injury due to firearms is another example. Tertiary means of prevention such as treatment of brain injury by the neurosurgical crowd is certainly not the ideal. Secondary prevention such as gun safety education is not considered adequate by some segments of the population. The true primary preventative intervention would be to ban guns altogether, and, again, certain voices in and out of medicine propose that as well.
Why should prevention of teenage pregnancy be any different? Would it not be better to facilitate a primary prevention model for the problem? Because it doesn’t work? The same thing could be said for the obesity problem, yet millions of dollars are spent in figuring out how to provide the health education necessary to convince millions of us to adjust our diets and eating habits, clearly a primary prevention model. If the current model of primary prevention of teenage pregnancy is ineffective, then it would seem that there should be a push to find a model of primary intervention that does work and not be satisfied with secondary and tertiary results. Our profession doesn’t accept this in most other areas of medicine.
The point is, this continuum of preventative measures is found all throughout medicine, and in my opinion, the New York City school system’s move to provide Plan B is an example of secondary or even tertiary prevention, and could be construed as a failure in the public health context as outlined above.
Posted by: Wade Kartchner, MD, MPH | 09/27/2012 at 11:25 AM